18
Jul 10

Eagle Dive

Bald eagle (captive) diving in on me at high speed. Camera set to continuous auto-focus (AF-C in Nikon speak), single auto-focus sensor activated (center).

ISO 1000, f/6.3, 1/3200 s, at 300 mm. Exposure compensation +0 (bad idea at that moment – I would have needed at least a +1 here with the bird covering only a fraction of the original image, and the sky was cloudy white and bright. So I needed to add one EV during raw conversion, at the cost of even more noise. This photo is not printable in any decent quality.)

Know your gear, and know what it can do. You might be positively surprised. When trying something as daring as to catch an eagle during a high speed dive towards his trainer standing just 20 meters away from where you are, don’t expect miracles though – during his dive, I took 11 shots, and only 3 are in focus. Luckily, the last 2 are, with the eagle already having a decent size in the frame.

Some capabilities of your gear will be less often challenged, but still you should know that it will work when being out in the field. A great way to test and train for those birds in flight (the jargon calls this “BIF”) situations are the raptor flying displays of zoos, game reserves, or falconries. Make sure to visit those near your home, and visit them multiple times! The program of the show will vary not too much, and you will learn to anticipate what will happen and be ready for the moment. Don’t be disappointed when you don’t have any images to show after the first time you went there, think even of going there first without a camera!

This by the way was an obviously “imported” eagle showing off during the Glanzlichter nature photography days in Fürstenfeldbruck near Munich this year. The bird was launched by the falconer from the platform of the 75 m high bell tower of the monastery Fürstenfeld, and was called by a second falconer standing in the yard close to my position – the eagle did not take any detour, but knew his yummy award was waiting for him – he just pulled the wings and dropped like a stone with a (fierce) beak.

1 person likes this post.

12
Jul 10

Decision made: Photo Mechanic instead of Lightroom!

“Where have you been all along”?

Oh, I had feared you would ask – sorry for that extended break again. Now that the football world cup is over, more time for the important things in life remains, like updating my blog ;-) Promise!

A lot actually has happened since my last post, and I will need some time (yes, I know, if I am ever able to…)  to catch up, with my existing posting ideas turning into articles.

One of the major decisions I have made some weeks ago is to actually abandon Photoshop Elements for most purposes – a software I have used since version 2.0 when it was still called Photoshop Album – for something better. And of course, like everybody else not using a Mac (those also have the choice of Apple’s Aperture) I had considered Adobe Lightroom as the natural next thing to turn to. So when Adobe released the Lightroom 3.0 beta version, I gave it yet another try and installed it on my machine, to find out if I would like it this time. My first experiments two years ago ended with me not purchasing it, because Lightroom actually lacked many of the features I had come to like in Photoshop Elements back then.

Concurrently, I thought why not follow a tip I got on a workshop last fall by some fellow photographer who is actually a Lufthansa airline pilot and who recommended Photo Mechanic from Camera Bits, a tool seemingly known and used mostly by pro-photographers. Thinking, “Hey, this guy is a pilot, so he sure must like stuff that works and gets a job done!”, I downloaded and installed Photo Mechanic, and tried it concurrently with Lightroom for the image downloading and selection of a few photo shoots back in May.

To put it into perspective: Photo Mechanic is a pure photo downloading, browsing, and tagging/keywording application. That’s where the functionality stops. It is not a RAW converter, and has no image editing capabilities. In that, it is much more like the tandem of Nikon ViewNX and Nikon TransferNX you get for free when you buy a Nikon DSLR. The troubles I had with Nikon ViewNX I had blogged about earlier, and was starting to turn away from this combination as well.

“So what happened?”

From day one, I started using Photoshop Mechanic for my real “work”, instead of Nikon ViewNX. I had had the intention to merely test it, but I just never went back to my old tools. Hmmm. Does tell something, doesn’t it?

“And Lightroom?”

Yes, I forced myself to test it as well. I did, and though I had taken some classes on Lightroom previously on various occasions, and had a good grip on the software and its capabilities, it didn’t do the job for me as effortlessly and unobtrusively as Photo Mechanic. Instead of going into detail why, I for my part don’t think the selection of a software is a rational decision only – just like the selection of a camera body or a lens requires the real tactile feedback, the software has to feel like the right tool for the job at hand.

One point that certainly made a strong point for Photo Mechanic is the ridiculously low computing power requirement of the software. Mostly probably because it is exactly not a RAW converter, and since my lesson learned I always shoot JPG+RAW together, so I rely on Photoshop CS3 for the RAW conversion should I start image editing.

“Why is this important? Just get a faster machine!”

Well, for one, I did make a decision to spend money to buy stuff that makes me produce better photos, and just a new computer with more GHz and GByte will not do this for me. And secondly, looking forward I know I will need to get a Netbook for traveling soon, and as these are pleasantly cheap and pleasantly light by now, I have no intention to revert to a heavy and costly laptop for during-the-trip image downloading, selection and tagging (oh – you see my case now?).  Photo Mechanic actually made me feel I just got a new PC, it is so much faster than Nikon ViewNX. And I am running this on a 2003 Dell. If it runs on that, it will run on the Netbook as well.

“Well, that’s not a fair comparison – Lightroom is meant to run on modern PCs!”

Never said this was a fair comparison – I am just reporting what works for me at this time, and maybe to encourage you – if you are facing the same decision I did – to consider also non-mainstream solutions for yourself, maybe they fit you better, as they did fit me!

“Can you show me this ‘wonderful’ software?”

Sure I can! Here are some screenshots of the software in production at my place, but I want to encourage you to go to Camera Bits website – they of course have a fully functional trial version as well!

Here is a look at the thumbnail contact sheet view:

There is of course a larger single view as well:

This can do comparison views, in horizontal and vertical, locked and unlocked (surpassing ViewNX in this):

And the IPTC dialog looks very raw, but has many useful features:

It does support GPS as well, though I won’t change my GPS workflow using Geosetter for this, it is useful to be able to pop up the window with the Google Maps embedded:

“Hey, you must be kidding! This ain’t pretty!”

As said before, it works for me. Your mileage may vary ;-)


11
May 10

Mandarin Duck

Noticing I do not have enough *photos* on this website which after all was meant to be, well, the story of me learning nature photography, with this post I start a new category “Photo First” which will aim to present photos made by me without the whole story… I seem to be taking too long formulating my usually longer posts, and the photos get left behind.

This Mandarin duck photo I really like is from Xmas 2007. It was then and there when the first time I finally had the feeling that things were coming together in my bird photography: I had the sun in my back, had thought of putting the tripod very low (using an angle view finder), and even managed to get at least one kind-of-sharp image from the dynamic autofocus system. I liked the water color from the reflection of the vegetation behind the little pond, because it matches the duck’s own colors.

Looking at it today, I know it lacks critical sharpness. I tried to print it large (A2), and noticed the eye is slightly soft,  as the autofocus targeted slightly behind the duck’s head. Got to try it again…

2 people like this post.

09
May 10

Summer bird census

It seems to have just been a day before yesterday when I participated in the winter bird census, and so soon it’s time to count again…! For once I have not spent the 60 minute time in my usual Munich city park area, but in my parent-in-law’s garden in the more rural area of Moosburg an der Isar.

I am somewhat “disappointed” by the results, but of course in a small town garden you could  – without winter feeding – not expect to see an as varying bird population as in a large city park with it’s large and old tree groves. Anyway, I’m always willing to help science, and if it helps to protect the environment even better:

  1. Blackbird – two. Loud and very, very present in the garden and those around. They really love the roof ridges, what would they do without have they done before those were everywhere for them to sing from?
  2. Great tit – just one, in a quick fly-by.
  3. Blue tit – also one. Had really already given up hope for her to appear, but towards the end of the 60 minute count period she did :-)
  4. Rook – one, enjoying the blossoming apple tree vantage point.
  5. Magpie (Elster) – two.
  6. House Martin (Mehlschwalbe) – two, soaring high above.
  7. House sparrow – one. She was actually working right on the street extracting nesting material from some plant remains in the middle of the road – bravely just shortly interrupting her work for every car running over the plant, and in the end successfully retrieving the prize.

I have reported the results on the LBV website who organized the census together with the NABU, visit them to see the online updated results of the census!


10
Apr 10

Delete that image!

After having refreshed the image archive, there was just one more thing left: Revisit Texas. Long time readers might remember my disk space investigation one year ago, which led eventually to me buying my beloved little Synology DS 207+ NAS with 2 TB of disk space. Now, after having added those 5000 JPEGs to the disk, I was wondering how the disk space utilization came along, and whether I was threatened with another disk upgrade soon…

In case you are having the same thoughts, I have made the script I used to calculate that statistic available on the newly created download page at Alpenglow.info as freeware. I’m interested in feedback, so please give it a try and let me know if it works for you!

So here is the result of running the statistics script on my NAS:

disk_space_usage_2010Oh – positive suprise! The aggregated disk space curve actually flattens roughly mid-2009, despite my fears of faster image data growth after I had upgraded the camera to more Megapixels and Megabyte per image. What is the explanation? Well, it’s actually two:

  1. I did not have as much time for my hobby as I did before, and definitely did less photo shoots and excursions since then. I am inclined to change that again, and the next workshops are already booked :-)
  2. I definitely improved my workflow: Instead of importing the JPEGs into Photoshop Album, keywording and assigning the 1-5 star rating in there (usually keeping even the 1 star images), I rather go through the images using the RAW viewer Nikon ViewNX first, and use the “1″ key (which assigns a red category marker) for those images that are definitely not worth keeping. After I have made one pass through the images, I immediately use the filter selector to select all red category images, and delete them from the disk. Phew!

Now the one real challenge is to flag as many images for deletion as possible. And I definitely got better at this, being more critical towards my own images and recognizing when images will not be suitable for presentation and thus don’t satisfy my own quality criteria (and have no nostalgical value yet )  – to say it with the words of Florian Möllers, a workshop leader I once had the pleasure to experience on a nature photography course in the Bavarian Forest national park (I think to remember that Florian himself was quoting the late Fritz Pölking – please make sure to pay Fritz’ website a visit, there is definitely a wealth of information about nature photography there):

Tapfer sein! (Be courageous!)

Which translates to: Delete those images! Get rid of them immediately! There will be better days, and better photos!

2 people like this post.

13
Mar 10

Remember the milk… and the compact

Last weekend we finally went skiing again – cross country, of course. Being inspired by so many hours of wonderful HD Vancouver coverage, and the awesome winter weather out there, we booked a room in a little hotel in the Tannheim valley in Austria, less than 2 hours drive from Munich.

Guess what happened? Arriving on Sunday afternoon in the best of all possible sun flooded winter snows, we hit the track and had a great time. Next morning, things were even getting better – after one of the coldest nights of the year with temperatures way below -20° C (that’s -5° F), the sun came out and everything – and I mean really everything – was covered by the thickest hoar frost I have ever seen. And since last year I’m in love with hoar frost, remember?

We did a great tour of about 18 km through this wonderful landscape, and I’d love to show you photos – but I can’t, because while I had packed the huge Lowepro backpack with D300 and everything, I just forgot the tiny little Canon ixus 40 on my desk. Was too small. Just overlooked it in the huge pile of equipment I packed. I briefly considered taking the D300, but the >1 kg monster including lens was not suited for cross-contry, neither was the Computrekker Plus backpack. That is certainly not suited for any kind of sports, as it’s just barely ok for airplane travel.

Quickly decided to rathermore enjoy the scenery without taking pictures – only thing I can share of this perfect afternoon is our track. For more interest on geo-tagging and GPS data workflows, you’re invited to revisit my previous posts on this topic.

Wow, I just found a new feature in Google Earth 5.1 I had not noticed in it’s significance: It has a button for “Show sunlight across the landscape”. You can select date and time of day, and it will render the light. This could come in handy to predict cool photo spots in a mountainous landscape. Below the simulated phase of the Haldensee lake we touched on our ski tour at the time of day the sun dips below the first mountain range. This is certainly something I have to try in the future.

haldensee-simulation

Next day, of course, no hoar frost anymore and the sun showed itself a little less generous. Did ski, but the photos we took later that afternoon are really everything but impressive in terms of light. Look how flat the light is with snow and high fog… This is the (frozen) Haldensee lake, looking back from the position indicated on the track map towards the “camera” of the Google Earth picture shown above. The track across the lake was closed, for the ice obviously not being trusted after the prior weekend’s foehn.

haldensee

Lesson learned: Sometimes, less is more. And don’t be so stupid to leave the small camera at home.

1 person likes this post.

12
Mar 10

Body and lens selection for bird photography

Now, this is a peculiar coincidence which must not go by untapped: Scanning my backlog of link tips, I stopped at the pages Markus Jais has made detailing the options of camera bodies and lenses out there suited for bird photography. Admittedly, I had bookmarked his page over a year ago, and came back to it only today – just to find that he has updated the page to include all new Canon and Nikon camera bodies just yesterday! Same thought, different mind.

As I remember my months-long investigations and head scratching before deciding for the Sigma 100-300 f/4, I can only recommend to surf over to his page and have a look at his article on body selection, and the one on lens selection. I can agree with most of his conclusions, except maybe that you should also consider a Sony Alpha 700, which has the image stabilizer in the body stabilizing any of the long lenses.

Markus is an active member over at the Bird Photographers Net forums, which is certainly where I met him. Oh, and I just see he is living close to Munich as well!


11
Mar 10

Nikon ViewNX and Workflow – some thoughts

Coming back after other activities have not left sufficient time – as the regular readers will have noticed – for my photography hobby. Looking at the state of my archive, which I do maintain in JPG format using the Photoshop Elements 5.0 photo browser, I was in for a surprise.

I was missing about 5000 images I had taken in 2009 and 2010 from the archive. Not because Photoshop Elements somehow lost them, but because they actually never made it into the catalog – me being lazy. After I had had such a good grip on keywording the last 5 years, what had happened?

Well, the switch from the D70 to the D300 back in mid-2008 rendered the Nikon software I had purchased for about 150€, Nikon Capture 4.4, useless. I was to upgrade to CaptureNX, which I did give a test run but found it to be too different from Capture 4.4 to consider an immediate upgrade back then – I wanted to have another (probably my 3rd or 4th) look at Adobe Lightroom.

So I reverted back to use the Nikon View software that Nikon ships with its cameras, and upgraded this to the ViewNX 1.0 (up to 1.5 since then) so it could understand the D300’s RAW images. I found some very nice improvements in ViewNX over the original Nikon View (e.g. it keeps the 100% zoom when paging through images), so I changed my workflow to include ViewNX. Why didn’t I shoot RAW and JPG in parallel? Well, the D70 was not powerful enough to provide high quality JPGs in-camera concurrent with writing the RAW, they were of only basic quality. So this was not an option. The D300 of course could, but looking at the space requirements of the new 12 Megapixel images, I chose to keep my old workflow shooting RAW only.

What did I do different that prevented me from being diligent with my archival duties?

Well, the workflow with Nikon Capture was:

  1. Import from CF card using Nikon Transfer copying into a directory within the RAW/2008 sub-directory
  2. Immediately fire up Nikon Capture 4.4, and start the batch conversion to JPG on the newly imported images
  3. Move the resulting JPG files over into the JPG/2008 folder hierarchy
  4. Let Photoshop Elements detect the new files and import them – the JPG/2008 folder is among the watched folders of Photoshop Elements, so it will automatically offer to import them
  5. Keyword the images in Elements

I tried to perform the same workflow with ViewNX, and conceptually it works just the same. But there is one subtle difference that is only required on a variant of the official workflow above, the so called “I was lazy” variant (which does happen more often than I like): I might have downloaded and browsed the images of multiple shoots before I start the keywording workflow. So the images have already been downloaded and placed into separate folders (one per shooting). Easy enough with Nikon Capture, its Tools… Batch dialog has a simple “include subfolders” checkbox which I used to let it process all folders, not just one. And there is the gotcha – Nikon ViewNX’s export function can not do that.

Now, this is really ridiculous as this requires probably only a dozen lines of source code by the programmers of ViewNX, and leaving this option away leaves those programming-illiterate out in the rain or with a huge amount of manual mouse work. Thank you, Nikon!

I have fixed my problem with a self-written Python script that performs the following actions:

  1. Scan through the RAW folder, to find subdirectories that exist there but not in the JPG hierarchy. Those must be the newly transferred (or forgotten) shootings that have no equivalent in the JPG archive.
  2. For each of these folders, copy all RAW files into a single processing directory. Make sure not to touch the RAW directory, as this is the original data!
  3. Then the manual step: Fire up Nikon ViewNX, select all files in the processing directory, and start the export to JPG (high quality setting). Go to sleep… I have measured a conversion rate of about 150 images per hour on my trusty 2003-PC.
  4. Run the script again, it will now find the JPG images created, move them into the JPG archive hierarchy, and delete the RAW images.

Two tricks used here, as we programmers tend to do:

  1. I do not do a real copy of the RAW images, which would be really slow and expensive in terms of disk space, I rather use the Cygwin version of Python which can create hard links on the Windows file system using the os.link() function. This is a very quick operation that needs nearly no disk space, and ViewNX can’t see that this is “just” a hard link and will process the image as normal.
  2. Second trick is to keep the original directory name of the image – remember I do copy all RAW images into a single directory for ViewNX – as a prefix to the image name, so e.g. an image called 2008/20080130_D300_Ammersee/_DSC1234.NEF would be called 2008CCC20080130_D300AmmerseeCCC_DSC1234.NEF in the processing directory, with the CCC being my carefully chosen separator assuming that no image name contains the CCC character sequence. Moving the image to JPG, those separators are detected and replaced by the approriate slahes.

Script works nicely, ViewNX is chewing on the 5000+ file RAW backlog and I will have my archive up to date again.

Lesson learned: When not in dire need of CF Card space, shoot both RAW and JPG!


10
Jan 10

Watch this – Markus Botzek’s slide show

Watch this slide show from Markus Botzek, German nature photographer of some book-writing fame (and I have already given away his book as a present)!

Many great tips, many great images, some advice on photo locations and nature reserves, and as usual Markus is absolutely entertaining. Sorry, German dialect only ;-)

fotoforum 2009 – Naturfotografie from Galileo Design on Vimeo.

The text indicates the show was recorded on the 2009 annual gathering organized by the German magazine Fotoforum in Münster, Germany.


06
Jan 10

Bird Census 2010

Time flies, a year passed by, and it is winter bird census again! Like last year, this is organized by the Bavarian Bird Conservation Society LBV. And they are getting better at it, this year you can even see the online results of the Bavaria-wide census coming in life at their website!

Briefly, how it works: Volunteers count for one hour all birds they observe in a certain area (garden, park, …) on a specified day (January 6) and report their observations. Only the number of birds that are concurrently visible are counted, to avoid counting the same bird more than once. Which can easily happen, and it can get really hard to figure out the real number of them… Today I officially counted three Great Tits, but I am very sure it were at least 10 ;-) . It’s just you couldn’t see all of them at the same time…

As a location for my count, I for a change did not walk along the Isar river as usual, but chose a small but beautiful old park very close to my home, the Bürgermeistergarten of Munich’s district Bogenhausen. You can find more information and some photos here in the web, or even in the – didn’t know it exists – Munich Wiki.

Here is my result for today:

  1. Blackbird – two. A couple obviously, looking quite frozen at today’s high temperatures of -4° C.
  2. Great Spotted Woodpecker – one. High up in the old trees of the park. I heard him wood-pecking only once.
  3. Blue Tit – one. It especially liked one particular tree in the park.
  4. Great Tit – three. At least. They won being the most common winter bird in Bavaria in the last two years, so let’s see if they can make a hattrick! At the time of writing, the sparrows are leading though…
  5. Nut hatch – one. He was added to the list at the very end of the one hour observation period. No idea where he hid (and why :-) )
  6. Carrion Crow – Two. In flight, I saw some more, but as I am always unsure if they are not Rooks after all, I decided to only count the two on the ground I could have a closer look at.
  7. Feral Pigeons (City Doves) – Five. Beautiful birds, if you look close enough!
  8. Brambling – Two. This made my day! The first bramblings (German Bergfink) I have seen, and I was really confused at the first sight (and they were at the very very top of the largest tree). But on the second sighting I could get a looong look through my binoculars, and could study the bird good enough that my subsequent lookup in the bird book at home made it a 100% identification. Ah, birding excitement!

Today, again I didn’t take a camera with me because I wanted to do a good job counting just like last year– did I miss a photo opportunity? I don’t think so, as we like last year had a grey overcast sky and the light was very dim. I might have been able to get an ID shot of the Brambling, but by now I am experienced enough to memorize the bird’s feather colors for identification at home :-)