February, 2009


24
Feb 09

Move to Texas?

When thinking about disk space, the old IT insider joke always comes to mind, where a user asks the sysad for more space, and the answer is “Well, why not move to Texas?”.

I still chuckle on this one. It is from the first chapter of the bastard operator from hell series, which we found enormously funny back in University.

Now, I am looking with a frown at my disk space, and have decided to give it a more in-depth look. Having switched from the Nikon D70 with it’s 5 MByte mandatory compressed RAWs to the D300 which happily requires 15 MBytes per RAW, I want to plan ahead:

The chart shows the disk space for each of the four cameras that are or have been in use by me in the last near-five years: The little Canon ixus 40, the workhorse Nikon D70, the backup and lightweight D40, and the new D300. I almost exclusively shoot RAW, and convert JPGs to disk on the computer for my archive managed by Photoshop Elements 5. The RAWs stay on disk as well as the JPGs.

Quick summary: While I added about 36 GBytes in 2005 and 2006, in 2007 and 2008 it was already 60 to 80 GBytes. And it will grow faster with the D300. Free disk space as of today on my main photo drive: 124 GBytes. On the hot mirror drive: 60 GBytes, but only if I remove the backup copy of my MP3s.

Prediction: In 6 months, the hot mirror at the very least will be full and be in need to be replaced by a larger drive (it’s a 400 GB drive now, while the main drive is a 750 GB drive).

The external (shelf-) backup drive is already full, and I have no place to backup the MP3s. I have an unused Hitachi Deskstar 250 GByte SATA drive on my desk, but no external housing for it. That could take the MP3s and other data. Or I’ll just buy a new large external drive, and reuse the existing 250 GBytes external backup for the music files.

Still need a new external backup drive, and some more hard disks in this year. Or maybe finally a NAS?


22
Feb 09

Fotomagazin, March 2009 issue

Continuing to look at the paper magazines on my desk, here is a quick comment on the usefulness of the March issue of the German Fotomagazin, a publication I have been reading regularly for the past 4 years mostly for their extensive coverage of the lens market with technical reviews.

What did they have?

  • A rather lengthy and in my eyes unnecessary comparison of again the Canon and Nikon DSLR offerings. For anybody who is not up to a buy decision within the next 3 months there is not much of interest in there, and as PMA 2009 is approaching anyway it might even be outdated within weeks.
  • A test of third party ring-light flashes, of which the Metz mecablitz 15 MS-1 digital seemed to be a clear winner and with about 300€ also the most expensive one. This is an interesting item for those doing macro flash photography. Other devices tested were a ring light from B.I.G. and a Soligor/Dörr/Bilora/Marumi-marketed flash being the identical device from each vendor.
  • Dibond, Diasec, Kappa, and other methods of finishing printed photos are explained in a short article in the “practice” section, but honestly there is not nearly enough information in there to know where to start. Sorry guys, some more in-depth information would be required to get me started on this topic, this is not more than a teaser.
  • The art photography market is in flux according to another article, and they list as an example two different German online art galleries with two different concepts, namely Mygall from Leipzig offering any photographer to sell his art as large prints over their website, and the more restricted Hamburg-based eyemos photo art [Update: eyemos seems to be gone as of Feb 2011] who only offer art from a selected handful of photographers, with much higher prices. Worth a look by me, if I ever get around to product a portfolio I am satisfied enough with to expect money for ;-)
  • In the post production section, they have a lengthy Photoshop example by Calvin Hollywood turning a great studio portrait image to start with into an even greater image. Very cool images on his web site, by the way, make sure to have a look. He is offering DVDs with more photoshop tips as well as seminars in Germany.
    Some interesting techniques in there to create a “fake HDR” look for an image that wasn’t HDR. Took a note on the referenced German-language forum Photoshopnonstop for this type of heavy-post production discussion.

Hmm. Overall rating of this issue worth being read: 2 out of 5 stars. This is a pure subjective expression of how much I got out of this issue for my own benefit, as of today. This might vary greatly if measured again in the future :-)


21
Feb 09

Naturfoto, December 2008 issue

In continuing to review also paper magazines I read, I’ll sum up what I got out of the December 2008 issue of the German language Naturfoto magazine. I think I will start rating the individual issues and later create a statistic of how interesting I found the read – because somewhere in the back of my head something is whispering that I do not get enough out of every read to justify the, well, time spent on buying and reading… maybe it’s better get out and make some photos myself…

  • There is an amazing photo of a griffon vulture sitting in the top of a tree, with two crows next to him being obviously annoyed by the presence of that large guy – and probably not used to him, because this photo was made on the German island of Neuwerk, near the mouth of the Elbe river. Griffon vultures are not common in northern Germany :-)
    This reminds me I should put Neuwerk on my places to visit list!
  • On meta data management, they have a sidebar on the commercial initiative of the Metadata Working Group including Adobe, Microsoft, and others. They have published a specification document (downloadable as PDF) on how to handle photo metadata using Exif, IPTC, and XMP. I’ll put that on my backlog to check out – my meta data management certainly is not up to industry standards yet…
  • German Internet FotoTV has made a program on sharpness in pictures and sharpening methods. This sounds interesting, but I am not a subscriber to FotoTV (yet?), and this is not pay per view. Too bad.
  • There is a long and very nice article about photographing cranes in spain – in the Laguna de Gallocanta. They even claim this is the best place in Europe to go photographing cranes. The article was written by Dieter Damschen, who is working for a photo tour organization Reisen In Die Natur, who – surprise – offer guided trips there. Hmm. Goes on my places list. (Yikes – the trip costs 1640€ for a week including flight).
  • In the ad section, Naturerlebnisse as a tour organizer struck me with an offer for a Helgoland trip in January. So I might be a bit late ;-) , but of course they have more offerings on their website. Noted.
  • Next to that, another company offers trips to Greece. 800€ without flight for one week. Hmmm. Might be nice. They advertise bee-eaters and pelicans (Great White as well as Dalmatians).
  • While we’re at it, at the Hungarian National Park Kiskunsagi there is the offer of a nice accomodation called Somodi Tanya. (in their ad they say it’s in the National Park Fülöphaza. I have never been in Hungary, I think I have to check a map. And I have to do a bit more research to find out the right links for this.)

Overall rating? Well, some great photos, but the ads seemed to offer more take-away value than the articles. This gets a 3 out of 5 star rating.


Highslide for Wordpress Plugin